Spies in the sky

Spies in the sky

ACLU public forum to cover use of drones by local police

By Nick Smith 01/01/2013

Like it? Tweet it! SHARE IT!

While the Second Amendment has been debated in the weeks following the Dec. 14 shooting in Newtown, Conn., the Fourth Amendment, which provides protection against unreasonable searches and seizures, will be placed under the proverbial microscope of a concerned Southern California citizenry in the weeks and months to come.

In June, Pasadena Star-News Public Editor Larry Wilson drew attention to a report by KNX News Radio’s Charles Feldman that AeroVironment, a local manufacturer of unmanned aircraft vehicles (UAVs) — the same manufacturer of systems employed by the US military in Iraq and Afghanistan — has plans to market its Qube® Unmanned Aircraft to an estimated 18,000 local law enforcement agencies throughout the country.

UAVs, or drones, are currently used by the US Air Force for “recording information on domestic situations,” according to Feldman’s report, but guidelines allow additional information gathered incidentally to be shared with  the Department of Defense or another government agency. The report further states that Southern California law enforcement agencies are looking into the efficiency of using drones.

According to AeroVironment’s Web site, Qube systems “[transmit] live video directly to the operator at a fraction of the cost of manned aircraft.” Smaller (and much quieter) than police helicopters, one might wonder if usage of UAVs could be a reasonable alternative to the Pasadena Police Department’s reliance on helicopter surveillance.
Still, privacy advocates are concerned about the idea of unwarranted and unbridled drone surveillance by their local police.

“There are apparently no rules and regulations of any rigor that have been formulated by Congress,” says former ACLU Pasadena-Foothills Chapter President Kris Ockershauser. “Before we use these things [drones], you have to have some rules and regulations which … prevent intrusive invasion of privacy.”

The Pasadena ACLU is sponsoring a public forum, to be held at 7 p.m. Tuesday at Neighborhood Church, 301 N. Orange Grove Blvd., Pasadena. Feldman is expected to present his report at the forum, with comments from Wilson and ACLU attorney Peter Bibring, who will also speak about the implementation of strict regulations and accountability procedures as necessary before drones are to be used by local law enforcement agencies

DIGG | del.icio.us | REDDIT

Like it? Tweet it!

Other Stories by Nick Smith

Related Articles


Drone warfare isn't coming to America ... it's already here! Furthermore, it's (either) the government (or contracted corporations) who have the drones, and it's the Constitution-loving population that's becoming the target ... "You don't need no (First, Second, or) Fourth Amendment!"

While the sociopathic crowd among us are being driven by their big-pharma-delivered SSRI drugs to commit unspeakable atrocities with guns (and other weapons) in "gun-free" zones, Hollywood's gun-grabbing thespian-cabal is doing everything it can to hypocritically exacerbate the problem while also acting appalled at all the violence:


The prostitute actors and actresses of "progressive" Hollywood, whores in so many ways.


posted by DanD on 1/06/13 @ 09:39 a.m.

Why BarryHO = Bush III.



posted by DanD on 1/07/13 @ 10:53 a.m.
Post A Comment

Requires free registration.

(Forgotten your password?")