'Wrongful  acts'

'Wrongful acts'

Laid-off management association members file claim against city over alleged conspiracy to dump them

By André Coleman , Kevin Uhrich 06/14/2012

Like it? Tweet it! SHARE IT!

Did top Pasadena officials break the state’s open meeting law, as well as a number of labor statutes, by conspiring to get rid of employees from the city’s only management bargaining unit?

That’s the contention of seven members of the city’s Pasadena Management Association (PMA), who were among 10 association members laid off in February and last week filed a claim for damages totaling $9.8 million in addition to an undetermined amount in back pay.

The claim alleges City Manager Michael Beck and another 50 city officials referred to in the suit as “John Does,” including Pasadena Mayor Bill Bogaard, members of the City Council and other department heads, conspired to do away with their jobs, resulting in a violation of the state’s open meeting laws as well as state and federal labor statutes protecting employees.

The seven PMA members — Sheri Stevenson, Emily Stadnicki, Neville Pereira, Thelma “Jean” Luter, Antonio Gardea, Ursula Schmidt and Maria Valenzuela — also allege they were denied due process and suffered age discrimination at the hands of Beck and the other top city leaders.

One of the plaintiffs, Stevenson, a former management analyst serving as “representative claimant,” claims Beck libeled and defamed her at a meeting in West Covina in December in which Beck called Stevenson the “resident contrarian.” Within two months of that meeting, Stevenson was laid off.

In the claim, Pasadena attorney Stephen J. Horvath is asking not only for $9.8 million, but also his clients’ old jobs back, with compensation for time lost. Horvath is also asking that the city pay an additional $50,000 to the PMA.
“Claimants allege that each ‘Doe’ defendant is in some manner responsible for the wrongs alleged herein, in that each such defendant advised, encouraged, participated in, ratified, directed or conspired to do the wrongful acts alleged herein,” the claim states.

“With knowledge of the wrongful acts and omissions of every other defendant, each defendant encouraged, embraced, acquiesced in, benefited from and ratified the conduct of every other defendant,” according to the document.
According to its Web site, the PMA is the official bargaining unit for the city’s more than 500 management employees. It provides collective bargaining and other labor-related services to all city departments, except Human Resources and sworn members of the Fire and Police departments.

In a prepared statement, Beck said “The layoffs referred to in the [claim] are an unfortunate result of the economic realities that the city has been working through during the past few years.  We realize this is a difficult time for those who were laid off, but we did provide up to six months of severance for each employee affected. They were done fairly and properly and helped us preserve as many other jobs as possible.”

“The layoffs fall disproportionately on the members of the PMA,” states the claim, filed June 7 with the City Clerk’s Office. “As all 10 employees selected for separation from employment were all members of the PMA, and no unrepresented employees or employees represented by collective bargaining units were laid off, these facts raise an inference that the claimants were separated from employment because of their membership with the PMA.”

All of the employees listed, except for Stadnicki, are over 40 years old, according to the claim, which also states all the affected workers were replaced by significantly younger employees with far less seniority.

“Claimants will concurrently or shortly file claims with the [state] Department of Fair Employment and Housing as prerequisite to filing a civil action for age discrimination based on the layoffs,” the claim states.

The claim was filed the same day the Pasadena Weekly reported that workers in the city’s 16 departments made more than $2.3 million in credit card purchases — much of it spent on food and travel costs — during the past five months, including the time PMA workers were being laid off.

One of those workers was Luter, a 31-year city employee and former management analyst charged with overseeing city credit card purchases. Luter was laid off before her superiors could act on her request to suspend the credit card privileges of Human Services and Recreation Department Director Mercy Santoro for making what Luter called questionable purchases.

Councilman Victor Gordo said he was contacted over the weekend by angry constituents demanding that he brown-bag whatever he eats at City Hall. Gordo said documents released by the city, which were initially believed to be individual credit cards, were actually receipts from a city account that is used by the council for food and travel costs, which in the council’s case totaled $10,759 from January to May.

Gordo has asked Beck to see all the credit card receipts from each department. “I want to see what they are purchasing, what these charges are for,” Gordo said.

Along with spending $978 for a Busy Body Home Fitness machine purchased in January, art supplies from Blick Art supply shop in Old Pasadena totaling $587.71, $2,083 in party supplies from the Oriental Trading Co., $981 for Dodgers tickets on May 4, $1,883 for bowling at AMF 300, and $1,456 paid to the Cheerleading Co., which specializes in cheerleading equipment, Santoro’s department also charged $9,640 of the $177,295 spent on credit on food or food-related items from a number of restaurants, markets and other vendors. Santoro has not responded to numerous calls for comment.

“I was outraged,” said Ralph Royds, a public labor adviser working with the former employees, after reading about some of the spending done by the city’s top managers during the months that longtime workers were being let go and replaced.

“City management made public statements that they were going to take all the steps they could to save jobs. Yet, they were spending freely on their own jobs with their city credit cards. At the time they were doing that, they gave us notice that there were 63 open positions. If you are trying to save jobs, why aren’t you freezing positions and cutting back on lunches with the credit cards?”

Royds told the Weekly he believes Beck started targeting PMA employees after the group did not agree to make further contract concessions during negotiations.

He also said that since 2011, about 80 percent of the city employees laid off have been PMA members and that Beck is clearly trying to break the association, which was first formed in 1994.

In February, city credit receipts obtained by the Weekly through a Public Records Act request showed employees in Beck’s office charged $1,368.37 at local restaurants, including $522.84 spent for two rooms at the Miramonte Resort and Spa in Indian Wells, located about two hours from Pasadena in Riverside County, where Beck previously worked. Another $72.80 apiece was spent on two rooms at Harrah’s Casino in Las Vegas in May.

All told, $13,237 of the $38,725 charged to the cards, or nearly 30 percent, was spent by the City Manager’s Office on food or food-related services. Travel came to just more than $5,000, or 13 percent of total credit card purchases claimed by Beck’s office.

And now, with the layoff of Luter, the sole person charged with monitoring credit card buying among the more than 500 employees in possession of a city credit card, it appears there will be even fewer controls in place to ensure taxpayer-backed purchases are justified.

Luter told the Weekly she thought she was laid off because of her age, even though she had recently questioned spending by the Human Services and Recreation Department.

Differences between the city and PMA members came to a head in early February. During a closed-session meeting before the Feb. 6 City Council meeting, the council engaged in a labor conference with representatives from the group. Although the Ralph M. Brown Act — a state law that governs meetings of legislative bodies like the Pasadena City Council — requires action taken in closed session to be reported at the start of open session, no action was reported to have come from that meeting. Three days later, employees began receiving layoff notices, although none had received disciplinary meetings or were given the chance to appeal the decision, two guarantees stipulated in the group’s memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the city.

The closed session decision was allegedly later revealed by the city’s Human Resources manager, Richard F. Kunz, who the claim says admitted to employees that the decision to terminate them had been made by the council during closed session at the Feb. 6 meeting.

First Amendment expert Terry Francke, head of Carmichael-based Californians Aware, told the Weekly the city may have violated the Brown Act.

“Any decision to terminate employees by council would have to be reported,” Francke said. However, “The ambiguity is depending on what the city structure is. A charter structure [which Pasadena has] usually gives the city manager full discretion to hire and fire,” he said.

“If [the council] simply heard a report from the city manager, they probably would say there is no reportable action,” Francke said.

According to the minutes of that meeting, the discussion was listed as a “City Council conference.” The PMA, along with other city unions, as well as two other separate matters, “were discussed, with no reportable action at this time,” according to the meeting’s minutes.

Along with Beck and Bogaard, the lawsuit lists Kunz, Director of Finance Andrew Green and, former Acting Human Resources head Julie Gutierrez as the city employees responsible for “conspiring” with Beck to eliminate their positions.  
According to Royds, the problems began during negotiations for a new MOU between the city and the PMA. Both sides agreed to concessions, but city officials allegedly wanted more.

“Right after signing a new memorandum of understanding with the city, where both parties agreed to concessions, the PMA went on with their business and then the city started laying off members,” Royds told the Weekly.

DIGG | del.icio.us | REDDIT

Like it? Tweet it!

Other Stories by André Coleman

Other Stories by Kevin Uhrich

Related Articles


Is it true that M. (V.) Beck has a secret alter located in some dank, dark closet down at city hall where he periodically sacrifices to a gold-plated icon of the great neo-con profit Scott Walker some secretly aborted child of a terminated PMA member?


posted by DanD on 6/14/12 @ 06:05 p.m.

You know Kevin ~

Censorship happens in many guises, and the PWeekly's cyber-editor is doing a vast disservice to the rest of the world's TRall fans by failing to post his artwork (at least since April 20th)! I don't know about you, but if I were Ted, I'd be a little pissed. Similarly, TTomorrow's musings are also being withheld from the Weekly's cyber-readers, as is also the surrendered opinions within the Weekly's "LETTERS-TO-THE-EDITOR.

Why does the Pasadena Weekly hate it cyber-fan base?


posted by DanD on 6/15/12 @ 06:54 a.m.

The Pasadena Management Employees voted and ratified a MOU in 2008 which they agreed to a 16% raise increase over four years . In return they agreed to become AT-Will-Employee's, voluntary reduced work hour reductions and layoffs. The problem is that the Pasadena Management Employees culture and mindset never imagined that the City Manager would ever utilize these options to balance the budget. Wake up, you agreed to AT-Will-Employment. Pasadena Managers need to honor their MOU.

posted by Badactingpolice on 6/15/12 @ 09:30 p.m.

That is patently incorrect. Members of the Pasadena Management Association (PMA) made so many concessions since 2008 that their salaries actually are LESS than they were then. They gave back 8% in raises, now pay the full 8% of their retirement (one of only two unions to do so), were furloughed at a 10% loss in salary for 15 months, and still had 14 members laid off in 2011 and 10 in 2012. So, actually it's the Beck Administration that needs to honor PMA's MOU and treat management staff with the respect and dignity they deserve.

posted by FactCheck on 6/16/12 @ 01:54 a.m.

Furthermore, it's the non-represented employees which total in the hundreds and who ARE at-will-employees (unlike management staff), which includes Department Heads AND the City Manager, who don't fully contribute to paying their own retirement, who have perks like car allowances and receive monthly stipends for cell phone use, who are charging expensive lunches on taxpayer paid credit cards, who SHOULD BE dealt with. Of course that won't happen now, since the City of Pasadena laid off 1) the internal auditor, 2) the management analyst who checks credit card expenditures, and 3) the management analyst who had the courage to ask questions, expose things that were covered up and swept under the rug, and represented those managers who are true civil servants with a proud work ethic!

posted by FactCheck on 6/16/12 @ 02:02 a.m.

Good-cop > bad-cop?

Whenever any employee who is watching the honesty of top management gets laid off by the very people being monitored, should that be considered a "RED FLAG?" Certainly, it trains whoever inherits the "watcher" role to NOT rock any boats (else, they will also get laid off)!

This is how aristocracy (in)breeds itself while travelling the road to fiscal calamity. If this was a George Orwell tale, M(V)B would be lounging around at the pentacle of the porcine pyramid of bureaucratic power.

As much as anything else, the politics of managerial hubris is most destructive as an administrative infection. Self-sustainingly, it becomes almost venereal in how it can ruin almost any institution.


posted by DanD on 6/16/12 @ 04:50 a.m.

Thank you FactCheck for outlining, so eloquently, to the Pasadena Weekly reader, how the mechanism of At-Will-Employment forced PMA back to the table and produced the desired outcome that the City Manager wanted. PMA members agreeing to more concessions. I'm not saying it's right.

posted by Badactingpolice on 6/16/12 @ 10:07 a.m.

"Ditto!" badactingpolice. PMA members in the lawsuit, "If not you than who," the actual workers doing a legitimate and justifiable work, or a heavy overpaid middle management? The fact that credit card spending is outrageous, does not necessarily mean it would have saved numerous overly staffed positions. In at least one instance a PMA member noted in the article position was actually eliminated well before the first wave of layoff. This individual should not give the illusion that they are being retaliated or blindsided by an inevitable layoff. Goodluck in your future endeavour, but move on already your not immune to restructuring

posted by WhipIt on 6/16/12 @ 06:55 p.m.

The schadenfreude of Pasadena City Management ~

How do you get a whole subset of City workers to quite effectively be less competent at collectively producing a better working environment for themselves? Simple, you have those poor suckers assemble the best work-place negotiators from among their ranks, you next sham an employment compact with them using a good-faith pretense, AND THEN you terminate the employment of those representatives WITH PREJUDICE (with the prejudice being that of the City Manager, who pretty-much lays off any "at-will" non-surrendering worker that he goddam-well wants to) ... but you call it a general work-force reduction (that just so happened to target all those competent negotiators).

Why does the City Council need "good-faith" when they've got the Michael Beck wrecking crew?


posted by DanD on 6/20/12 @ 06:48 p.m.
Post A Comment

Requires free registration.

(Forgotten your password?")